Poor Rudolph

Posted on by Thomas Smith

Baby Its really getting cold outside….. the world that is, not talking about the song. It seems that every tradition and icon is up for grabs. Every statue and history must be re done or taken down because a vocal few have become so zealous about creating ‘safe spaces” for people.

Rudolph is now a poster child for victimization of bullying. Santa has legalized human trafficking by keeping elves as virtual indentured servants. And the naughty/nice list is threatening to the well being of children by attempting to bribe and manipulate with presents.

As the world increasingly looks inward not upward, it continues to nit pick and pick apart every thing that should never have been made a big thing. Desperate for likes, and thumbs ups, and re-posts and re-tweets, there is an addiction to being worth something by being the latest trending post about something more and more ridiculous…

But that’s the issue isnt it? Wanting attention, wanting to matter, wanting to have some value and purpose. It is the emtpiness that is longing for a filling that is driving this. And it is the sullen silence of earth heard when the Angels proclaim “ Joy to the World”.

The Christ Emmanuel Child came to tell us we matter very much, that we are worth an incredible price, his life! He came that man no more should die…. Glory in excelsis Deo!

He was the light in dark streets, the one who could help us find inner peace in a world going increasingly, rapidly crazy! He can be your peace, your fulfillment if you allow Him to.

It is up to us to believe or not, but “us without God”, is making the world into a world where even the cherished childhood stories like Rudolphs’ get manipulated and co-oerced into being part of the Lunacy…. We can choose not to enter the Asylum. WE can choose to believe and preserve the faith handed down, and the wonderful traditions we have been given.

Untie the "nots"

Posted on by Thomas Smith

The word solo is defined as “Alone, no additional voices, separate.” There are many Christians who don’t get that church is a symphony not a solo. It is about being together, hearing different voices and not getting all tied up in “nots” about it.

I did “not” like the message, the music, the comment, the version of scripture, the length of the service.I do not like so and so because of the way they __________. You fill in the blank. The list is endless.

But The first century church taught people to “untie the nots”. In every single case they were showing the “one-another” of Jesus that so dominates the New Testament. Even under persecution and difficult times, every effort was made to stay in fellowship. If you want to know the secret of the Church’s survival, there it is. If you want to hypothesize about the Church’s decline, there it is.

Church-less Christians or Christians in Church without loving fellowship cannot experience the most basic command of Christ or fulfill it-“ Love one another”. There are Christians who say they love God…. his children? not so much. They flee from any differences of opinion or do worse- create dissension hoping to drive the other away from those they do like and agree with.

They love Christ but some parts of the body they don’t value much. They might say “well they are….” and immediately we see the issue . The finger pointing, old sinful judging, critical self blinded by the protruding log in their own eye which clearly shows they have not prayed about the matter, not restrained their tongues, have not exhibited mercy over judgement and a dozen other biblical directives. Something rings very hollow when a professed Christian does such.

Jesus said the gates of Hell would not prevail against his Church… HIS Church. The one designed by him to be loving, accommodating, encouraging.Serving one another, loving one another,FORGIVING ONE ANOTHER. His Church would stand Together in strength and unity.

Hell and the Devil love fragmentation in the church; Insert the wedge, break apart unity is the simple tactic. We so often fail to see that we are being used against the work and purpose of the Church the moment we say “They” or perpetuate gossip “ did you hear” ? Dismemberment is not a pretty picture to think about but that is just what happens when we do these things. We start the spiritual tearing apart of something so special to God. And I shudder to think about our examination before the Bema seat of God, if we made it that far.

Hebrews 10:25 exhorts us to “ not neglect meeting together as is the habit of some, but encourage one another, all the more as you see the Day approaching.” Pastorally, I look at the world and people’s lives and hardening hearts and I see “the Day” approaching. The prior verse 24 tells us how to spend our time: “spur one another on to love and good deeds.”

Church-less Christians cant do that and Church Critics certainly don’t because there is no “one another”, just the self centered, the self righteous, all tied up in “nots”. So just what are they?A solo act. Contrary to every new testament definition of what Christians should be like.

“My prayer- Lord, help us “untie the Nots” in the body of Christ as we see the day approach. Let us glorify God in the way that the Church relates within itself and witnesses to the people watching.” Philippians 1":9-11 tells us “ whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do it for the Glory of God”.

That’s hard to do as a solo act at home with no interaction with the body of Christ.

Life is Hard,God provides

Posted on by Thomas Smith

The 23rd Psalm is one of the most quoted verses at funerals. It’s beautiful imagery of rest and still waters is what we long for. Can we get an Amen to “All I want is a little peace and quiet”! But it should be a life verse for us.

But there is little peace in the land and sadly people choose to escape through drugs, alcohol and suicide. 1 in 25 Teenagers has attempted it. 1 in 8 think about it. It is the 3rd leading cause of death for ages 10 to 24 yrs. The elder rate is rising rapidly as well.

Life is hard. Life is overwhelming. We do get more than we can handle and the Bible no where says you wont. It does record Jesus telling us “ give it up, turn it over, stop worrying, trust me, cast your cares upon me, and many other similar things. But we just dont or wont.

We have a lot of bad habits which take us to bad places. Psalm 23 :5 says “you prepare a table for me..” Not in the palace, not in the peaceful park by the stream, not in your favorite place. In the presence of your enemies!

How can that be good? Its all good if you know that the one who is throwing the party is able to throw the enemies out as well. It is a picture of protection of God. Rest in that picture.

David continues “goodness and mercy shall follow me”…… because God is goodness and mercy and He not only follows, he goes before us. When life assails(it will), when enemies slander and gossip(they will) that is your time to recall the peaceful stream, the green pasture and remember that God has placed a watch over you and over your life and when you get to the point when you cant bear it, choose to let him bear it. Its how He made us.

Contemporary Perspectives on Relgion

Posted on by Thomas Smith

The following  gives us a perspective on contemporary religious views vs traditional Christianity.One of the best and clearest I have read.
Pastor Tom

Contemporary Perspectives  on Religion
by Ben Edwards
Recent decades have provided Christians with an increasing evaluation of and interaction with various world religions. The growth of immigration from non-Christian nations combined with a greater global awareness through travel and communication have confronted Christians with the reality of diversity in faith and practice. Protestant Christians have responded in different ways to this reality. Often, these responses are grouped in three broad categories. However, with the rise of postmodernism a fourth category has appeared. I will endeavor to explain and evaluate these four approaches below, concluding with the approach I believe best adheres with biblical Christianity.
The first approach to world religions may be classified as universalism. Universalism proposes that all religions are more or less equal, with no one religion able to claim supremacy. Two common illustrations are used when explaining this approach, but provide slightly different nuances. The first is to picture salvation or truth as a mountain top and various religions as paths up the mountain. At points along the way these paths may appear different, but when followed to the end they lead to the same place. Thus, all religions ultimately teach the same thing. If adherents merely took the time to interact with one another they would discover how much they actually agreed. This perspective would eschew proselytizing, opting instead for simple dialogue.
Another picture is of a group of blind men approaching an elephant, with each man grabbing a different part of the animal and concluding partially true statements about it. However, none of them fully understands the elephant. In this illustration, no one religion has a claim to all truth. Instead, one must recognize that all religions have part of the truth, so the best approach is to incorporate beliefs from different religions.
Though this approach is popular among more liberal Protestants, attempts to defend it biblically are scarce. This scarcity is not surprising since there is little to no biblical support for universalism. Throughout the Old Testament, the God of the Jews is set in opposition to the gods of the surrounding peoples. The first commandment in the Decalogue places Yahweh as the supreme God. The nation is called to abandon other gods for the true God. In the New Testament, Jesus points to himself as “the way,” claiming that “no one comes to the Father except by [him].” Paul refers to the worship of idols as the worship of demons and applauds the Thessalonians for turning from idols to serve the true and living God. Nor are believers called to look to other religions to gain a better understanding of God. Jesus claimed that those who knew him knew God and that those who rejected him rejected God.
Universalism also creates logical difficulties. A thorough study of the different religions reveals that they do not all teach the same thing but often proclaim explicitly contradictory truths. Some religions are monotheistic, while others are polytheistic or pantheistic. Some believe that life is cyclical, while others hold to a linear view of history. Clearly all religions are not teaching the same thing. Arguing that all religions only have part of the truth does not ultimately solve this dilemma, for the only way to know that each religion has part of the truth is to have access to all of the truth. Those who hold universalism may have a laudable goal of reducing conflict by emphasizing unity, but they do injustice to the Bible and to other religions.
With the rise of postmodernism a modification of universalism has emerged that could be classified as relativism. Whereas universalism claims that all religions lead to the truth or contain part of the truth, relativism says that all religions have their own truths. In essence, a relativist would say that religions are not different paths up one mountain but different mountains altogether. This approach recognizes the clear differences between religions, but states that these different truths are not ultimately contradictory because they are true in themselves. There is no universal truth by which to judge the truths of the various religions. Again, the relativist sees no need for proselytizing, since no religion could be judged as better than another.
The relativist approach runs into the same biblical problem as the universalist approach. Christ not only claimed to be “the way” but also “the truth.” He called his followers to go throughout the world making disciples, which entails conversion to the truth. God is never portrayed as one choice among many but as the only God.
Ultimately, a relativistic approach to religions crumbles under the same difficulty as relativism in general—it is a self-defeating philosophy. Relativism proceeds on the idea that ultimate or universal truth is non-existent, but the claim that there is no universal truth is itself a universal truth. Further, relativism is incapable of condemning any action or attitude, since there is no standard by which to judge. In relativism, acts of terrorism and acts of charity are equally valid ways to demonstrate one’s commitment to religion. However, most people easily recognize these acts are not equally valid because of their universal sense of right and wrong. Though some may argue for a relativistic approach to religion, they never fully embrace it because of these difficulties.
A third approach to religion is inclusivism. In inclusivism, one’s own religion is the supreme religion, but other religions have truths that will ultimately lead to the truth found in the supreme religion. From a Christian perspective, that means that one can only be saved in Christ, but the Bible is not the only revelation of Christ. On the more liberal end of this perspective, proponents argue that sincere worshippers in other religions may be saved if they follow their religion and never have a chance to hear of Christ and Christianity. They believe the Quran has truths in it inspired by the Holy Spirit, so a devout Muslim who never hears of Christ may be saved by following these inspired truths in the Quran. On the more conservative end of this approach, proponents believe that someone may become a Christian by believing the gospel of Christ but continue to worship in their original religion. Thus, a Muslim may put faith in Christ but continue to practice as a Muslim because of the inspired truths in the Quran. An inclusivist would practice proselytizing but may not consider it an urgent matter.
Inclusivism does take seriously the biblical teaching that salvation is in Christ alone. It also recognizes the biblical teaching that some revelation of God has gone out to all people, i.e., general revelation. However, it fails to incorporate the Bible’s teaching on how an individual is saved through Christ. There are no biblical examples of a person being saved without knowledge of Christ. Rather, Paul states that people cannot believe in someone of whom they have never heard. Jesus’ command to go and make disciples would be less significant if salvation were possible apart from the proclamation of the Gospel. Inclusivism actually makes general revelation salvific in nature when the Bible never indicates that general revelation is able to lead to salvation. Romans 1 and Romans 2 both point to general revelation as important for the condemnation of all people, since people universally suppress the truth God has revealed about himself and his moral law, leaving unbelievers with no excuse.
On the more conservative end, proponents fail to incorporate the biblical teaching of conversion. Though they rightly recognize that salvation comes through faith in Christ, they minimize the transformative effects of that salvation. Salvation includes regeneration, which enables believers to turn from their sinful ways and turn to serve Christ alone. One of the evidences of regeneration is a rejection of false religion to embrace biblical Christianity. The proponents also distort the teaching of inspiration. The Bible claims inspiration for itself but does not extend that inspiration outside of itself. Any truth in other religions can be traced to general revelation and common grace rather than inspiration.
The final approach to world religions is exclusivism. This approach teaches that there is only one true religion and only one way of salvation. For a Christian, Christ is the only way of salvation and the Bible is the only source of saving revelation today. Other religions are sourced in man’s rebellion against God and/or demonic influence. Though other religions may have some truths in them, they are not saving truths. Exclusivism encourages proselytizing since it is the only hope for adherents of other religions to be saved.
This approach best lines up with the teachings of Scripture and of the beliefs held by the majority of Christians in church history. A potential danger in this approach is that one may develop an arrogant attitude that assumes possession of the truth entails superiority. However, a true understanding of salvation in Christianity minimizes this danger. Since the Bible teaches that salvation is a work of God graciously given to unworthy sinners, those who have been saved have no grounds for boasting. They do not have the truth because they have greater intelligence, morality, or wealth. Rather, they have the truth because they received grace and mercy and should desire to see others experience that same grace and mercy.